Christianity Today just released their list of the 10 Most Redeeming Films of 2008, and it reminded me of something I’ve been thinking about lately.
In fact, the article starts out asking something along the lines of the question I’ve been asking myself: “what’s a ‘redeeming’ film?” CT’s definition is “movies that include stories of redemption—sometimes blatantly, sometimes less so. Several of them literally have a character that represents a redeemer; all of them have characters who experience redemption to some degree—some quite clearly, some more subtly. Some are ‘feel-good’ movies that leave a smile on your face; some are a bit more uncomfortable to watch. But the redemptive element is there in all of these films.”
I’ve been wondering if Christians are too quick to praise a story because it’s supposedly “redemptive.” Usually these stories involve someone who did some bad thing(s), and by the end of the story they do something good. Is that really enough? Is something like The Blues Brothers really a “tale of redemption”?
If we are looking for stories that truly exemplify spiritual redemption, isn’t it necessary that there be a redeemer who takes on the burden of past sin? Should we be satisfied with stories that imply someone can redeem themselves?
If we are looking for stories that truly exemplify the state of redemption, shouldn’t we expect an admission of sin and repentance from sin? Is it possible to redeem someone if they’re not a captive? If sin is denied, how can there be redemption? Is it really redemption if it doesn’t result in repentance?
Obviously, we shouldn’t expect a story to mirror every aspect of the gospel. It’s not necessary for a story to be an allegory for it to display truth. However, I’m wondering if we should raise the bar of what it takes to reflect biblical truth. I think we should be on the lookout for “feel good” movies that are only redemptive from a humanistic, man-centered viewpoint.
You make a good point.
I did this about this as well, however. Dwight Pryor is fond of saying, “We are to live redeemed and redemptive lives.” In other words, we were redeemed for a purpose beyond our own eternal destiny. We are intended to partner with God in the healing of the world.
So a movie that tells a story of someone practicing “the good works that God created beforehand for us to do” (Eph 2:10) can definitely be accurately called “redemptive.”
Part of the issue is that those good works, both in real life and on the silver screen, are often practiced in the midst of a world desperately in need of redemption.
How often is it healthy to view reality? Certainly it is not healthy to view it gratuitously, but there is a place for the Schindler’s List’s of the world. By the same token, since movies are made by profit-driven corporations there is certain to be an overabundance of movies, and most today make no claim on having redemptive value, but are blatantly and solely for entertainment. When the realities of life become warped or abused for entertainment the line between entertainment and pornography becomes blurred and often crossed (one thinks of slasher flicks, for example).